Re: [dp-tf] Quadlogy of person proposals

[Janos Zsako <]

Dear all,

> Just a comment more: don't forget that the core for us is not to have
> fields to store private data, but, probably, have one_field_more to get
> the owner authorization to publish them.
>
> So, the big problem is that we normally have contacts from our maintainers
> that aren't owners of all data maintained. The question is who get the
> responsability to put the "yes" in that field. This is a rule that, I
> think, we have to build.
Very good point. I think the best approach is to have the responsibilty
reside with the maintainer. It would be good to have this in the service
contract (i.e. the service contract should say that by putting a person
object in the RIPE database, you acknowledge that you did get the approval
of the person to publish his/her data). This is what we have in the .hu
registration rules.

As far as I remember, the GM is now authorized to change the service contract
in such a way to be mandatory for all members (i.e. we do not have to have
all members sign again). We should bring this up at the next GM. Of course
this should be checked with the lawyers too.

Best regards,
Janos