|
|
 |
Re: [dns-wg] one more effort on the NTIA response
-
To: "Jim Reid" jim@localhost
-
From: McTim dogwallah@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 08:10:52 +0300
-
Cc: "Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis@localhost, dns-wg@localhost
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=auZCllbh0jiHBcV1MHI30ofuzu1f/dFI7cMD64B8ycQ=; b=E1JtyPBrn4KnACxwc45StwCHkyjwRbcH3Ec9e9dlm+oXx+5+eq/479A8cTLsDeXZIa 3Ay1K/g58T1lZDQ09wUIpMoOdWsbnDNStRxC6VZ1+XietGsAZDXKMxrzWAPi/mBAFrVL QMsgNOgnJ80TcMmrShq0VKipVx8HVc5pPibEw=
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=nUirWK4S7oSyF5DBONuwsVOCzopsANIBn8ynK3gIk9F1BHjbwP+HZLn8CWRLYZCoSK CABm4Del+TAaE65wq9gUEpzOKAYxI/S67jJsC3n3j07avgdmhEvTeJss8YyZiArx5tcW EjdHoiH8XgUQbu4eT0/gymv2J9/Vzit72RyCY=
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Jim Reid <> wrote:
On Nov 10, 2008, at 23:12, Edward Lewis wrote:
How about "While there may be reasons supporting the creation or introduction of another organization in the process of signing the root zone, the reasons are not technical in nature."
This pretty much says the same as what's already there, so no. In fact, your proposed text is far worse. It implies the WG concedes that there are reasons for adding another entity or layer of bureaucracy.
agreed, let's NOT open that door!
-- Cheers,
McTim http://stateoftheinternetin.ug
|
|
 |
 |