Re: [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE
-
To: Patrik Fältström paf@localhost
-
From: Andrei Robachevsky andrei@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:58 +0100
-
Cc: Jakob Schlyter jakob@localhost, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@localhost, dns-wg@localhost
Patrik Fältström wrote on 30-10-2008 07:34:
[...]> Now, we had this bullet:
>
> K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process must not
> require a change of keys.
>
> Then I thought about changing it to the following:
>
> K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process should
> minimize issues related to potential changes in keys when the entities
> changes.
>
> Now, I am a bit confused... :-)
>
> Jakob, Ed, others...do you have any suggestion on text?
>
I was under the impression that point K essentially said that
implementation should not cast the current root zone management setup
(with regards to the entities) in stone.
If this is so, how about the following:
K - Changes of the entities representing roles in the signing process
must be possible and have minimum effect on the keys.
> Patrik
>
Andrei
|