About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [dns-wg] NTIA and RIPE

  • To: Patrik Fältström paf@localhost
  • From: Andrei Robachevsky andrei@localhost
  • Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:52:58 +0100
  • Cc: Jakob Schlyter jakob@localhost, Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@localhost, dns-wg@localhost

Patrik Fältström wrote on 30-10-2008 07:34:
[...]> Now, we had this bullet:
> 
> K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process must not
> require a change of keys.
> 
> Then I thought about changing it to the following:
> 
> K - Changes to the entities and roles in the signing process should
> minimize issues related to potential changes in keys when the entities
> changes.
> 
> Now, I am a bit confused... :-)
> 
> Jakob, Ed, others...do you have any suggestion on text?
> 

I was under the impression that point K essentially said that
implementation should not cast the current root zone management setup
(with regards to the entities) in stone.

If this is so, how about the following:

K - Changes of the entities representing roles in the signing process
must be possible and have minimum effect on the keys.

>     Patrik
> 

Andrei



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community