Re: [dns-wg] .ORG DNSSEC Survey

[Lutz Donnerhacke lutz@localhost]

* Edward Lewis wrote:
> Given http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/dns/icann-root-signing.pdf and as 
> far as I know, no response back from ICANN to that, followed by the 
> exchange above perhaps the WG should ask about this situation.  (But 
> ask whom?)

After the DNSSEC session yesterday on the ICANN meeting in Paris, I had some
lengthy discussions with several board members on this subject. My impression
is, that ICANN is faced with serios concerns by the US Gov.

I think the right way is to prepare a policy proposal for the Cairo meeting
later this year. It might be worth thinking who should prepare the proposal.

> If indeed the (ICANN) root server operators have misgiving about the 
> experiment, could someone operating a root server express the reasons?

According the the talk today (slides are available on htp://par.icann.org),
there are no technical or operational issues anymore.