[dns-wg] Re: [dnssec-deployment] .SE releases report on consumer broadband routers
-
To: Patrik Wallstrom pawal@localhost
-
From: Patrik Fältström paf@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:47:11 +0100
-
Authentication-results: ams-dkim-1; header.From=paf@localhost dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/amsdkim1002 verified; );
-
Cc: "DNSSEC deployment" dnssec-deployment@localhost, dns-wg@localhost, dns-operations@localhost
-
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1078; t=1204022837; x=1204886837; c=relaxed/simple; s=amsdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paf@localhost z=From:=20=3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=3DE4ltstr=3DF6m?=3D=20<p af@localhost |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[dnssec-deployment]=20.SE=20releases=20 report=20on=20consumer=20broadband=20routers |Sender:=20; bh=7Gi0F8u+HPbDOxcePMIIb1iIRoQwnsdTE9fcnF9PWbQ=; b=jqQjiEv0Ip6fIpv55Q2iwSTyzywVsz48zztRap4rEBrIkUaUWYwoDBE9N8 4FiGvf3otV50GAN56VKPsn6x/LNu4Adu+LiQTHw4rFE34P13kIRLiQWru+xq SwJDLCYXCW;
Patrik, let me be one of the first that thank you and your team for
the hard work in doing this testing. Specifically as I early in this
process "complained" that it was hard for us as Cisco to get to know
which one (if any) of our products where involved.
Thanks!
Patrik
On 26 feb 2008, at 11.06, Patrik Wallstrom wrote:
"Three of the ten routers that .SE has tested, have passed the test
specification without any remarks. The other seven have had severe
problems when using what might be considered plain Domain Name System
(DNS). The majority of the routers does not manage to pass on DNSSEC
to the client, which gives you problems when there are applications on
the client that want to handle their own DNSSEC validation."
http://iis.se/about/press?id=135
The Excel document describing the result of the tests in more detail
is available on request.
--
Patrik Wallström
Project Manager, R&D
.SE (Stiftelsen för Internetinfrastruktur)
E-mail: pawal@localhost
Web: http://www.iis.se/
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
