Re: [dns-wg] Secondary service on ns.ripe.net for reverse delegations.

[Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs.cs@localhost]

In the light of this:

Jim Reid wrote:
> So the questions for the WG should be IMO:
>
> * Is there value in having the NCC provide DNS service for big/important 
> reverse zones?
> * If the answer to the above question is yes, under what conditions? ie 
> What do we mean by big or important?
> * If the answer is still yes, should this service be compulsory or 
> optional? And under what conditions would optional use become compulsory 
> and vice versa?
> * If the answer to the orginal question is no, what, if anything, does 
> the NCC do about things like lame delegations for reverse zones and the 
> operational problems these cause the NCC?
I'd like to mention that slaving Tier 1 ENUM zones on ns.ripe.net is 
also purely optional only - for very good reasons. Some of them are 
hidden in Jim's questions.
Best,

	Carsten