Re: [dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
-
To: Max Tulyev president@localhost
-
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:28:29 -0500
At 12:27 +0000 10/31/06, Max Tulyev wrote:
Edward Lewis wrote:
I think there is a reason to retire ccTLDs. Perhaps it is not
technical, but, if the ccTLDs are granted according to ISO3166, then
straying from ISO3166 as it retires country codes means that IANA would
have to have a policy and process for determining when to stray. I
think we are protected from having to deal with politics if we have a
strict policy of following ISO3166 (plus whatever exceptions we've
already grandfathered-in).
I think we should also take a look at each of that domain individually.
Is it usable? Is it grows? Does the community need it?
For example, SU grows fast (even it costs $100 per year now), need by
community and usable because of many people associate themselves with
ex-USSR, and many companies working in ex-USSR market. So this community
need it, as like as European people need EU domain (that also not in
ISO3166).
(of course, I'm protecting my cool e-mail too ;) )
The dotSU domain was the first time I was aware of the issue - when
someone tried to register a name server with a ".su" domain name.
I don't have a particular opinion on whether old ccTLDs are to be
shut down or not be shut down based on ISO3166 membership. But IANA
has a choice - blindly/faithfully follow that list and abide by the
policies governing it or use that list as a guideline and put in
place policies and processes for deviation. There are other
imaginative solutions - but that's for an IANA forum to discuss.
When I said "I think there is a reason" it's because I wouldn't want
to be involved in the set up of policies and processes for this. If
others want to, that's fine by me. ;)
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
Secrets of Success #107: Why arrive at 7am for the good parking space?
Come in at 11am while the early birds drive out to lunch.
|