[dns-wg] retiring old ccTLDs
-
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:06:34 -0500
-
Cc: ed.lewis@localhost
This prompted by the minutes, but it isn't a comment about the minutes:
At 21:20 +0200 10/11/06, Peter Koch wrote:
...
please find below the draft minutes of last week's two DNS WG sessions.
...
ICANN/IANA Update
(John Crain, ICANN)
<http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-53/presentations/icann_dns_wg.pdf>
Questions:
Rob Blokzijl asked why there was a move to retire old ccTLDs.
He could see no technical reason to do this. John agreed that there was
no compelling reason. He added that the question remained about whether
this should be done. Rob pointed out that current guidelines preclude
reuse of ISO3166 country codes for a period of five years. New guidelines
will change this to 50 years. Carsten Schiefner commented that .cs was
reused recently. Previously it was the code for Czechoslovakia; it was
then used for Serbia and Montenegro.
I think there is a reason to retire ccTLDs. Perhaps it is not
technical, but, if the ccTLDs are granted according to ISO3166, then
straying from ISO3166 as it retires country codes means that IANA
would have to have a policy and process for determining when to
stray. I think we are protected from having to deal with politics if
we have a strict policy of following ISO3166 (plus whatever
exceptions we've already grandfathered-in).
Once a country code is pulled from ISO3166, if there is a plan for
phasing it out (I don't think it is appropriate to debate a plan here
as this is an IANA matter) that's what any IANA plan should match.
I.e., how long until we yank them from the root zone? At what point
should an on-going registry refuse to list an NS record in a retired
country code domain?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar
Secrets of Success #107: Why arrive at 7am for the good parking space?
Come in at 11am while the early birds drive out to lunch.
|