Re: [db-wg] Re: [dns-wg] Proposal to change the syntax of "nserver:" attribute
-
To: db-wg@localhost, dns-wg@localhost
-
From: Daniel Roesen dr@localhost
-
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:51:17 +0200
-
Mail-followup-to: db-wg@localhost, dns-wg@localhost
Dear Katie,
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:59:47AM +0200, Katie Petrusha wrote:
> > What's the reason not to use one line per server and list all v4 an/or v6
> > addresses within that one line?
>
> 'One name per line' syntax seemed to be more clear and short...
Hm, I disagree. I'd prefer a syntax like Peter proposes too. It's
IMHO more logical to have one line per nameserver, and only list the
glue addresses behind it.
One nameserver, one line, with n (n >= 0) optional glue addresses. This
would be logical and intuitive for me. All else needs more complicated
parsing in mind and automated code.
Sorry for the late comment, didn't have much time to follow discussions
here lately. Feel free to ignore. :-)
Best regards,
Daniel
--
CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr@localhost -- dr@localhost -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
|