Re: [dns-wg] Deprecation of ip6.int scheduled for 1 June 2006
-
To: Lutz Donnerhacke lutz@localhost
-
From: Jeroen Massar jeroen@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:40:31 +0100
-
Organization: Unfix
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 10:22 +0000, Lutz Donnerhacke wrote:
> * Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > I don't know what Kazu San said about it, but one of the main reasons
> > being that the roots will from 1/6/2006 nicely return NXDOMAIN and the
> > resolver code won't try any further. Indeed the application won't get a
> > reverse, but hell, they should upgrade then.
>
> Upgrading Windows 2000 to XP or Vista will not happen that fast.
> Ok, let's show them numbers instead of names in tracert6.exe
Windows 2000 doesn't officialy support IPv6. If you have IPv6 on Win2k
it is severely broken at a couple of points. Next to that, does it
matter to see the numbers instead of names? It's not like you have SSH
running on it or anything which requires logging.
Thus what is the problem here?
Only XP SP1/Win2k3/Vista and later are officially supported by M$ to
have a working IPv6.
Next ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
|