Re: [dns-wg] TLD delegation trade-offs

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 11:50:39AM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote:
> At 15:47 +0000 6/7/05, bmanning@localhost wrote:
> 
> >	just for grins... how would DNSSEC "bend" around this
> >	supporting girder (or crutch if you prefer).
> 
> Having to know not to give up when seeing an unsigned answer coming 
> from a cache, treating this as a referral message and not a bogus 

	so... get back the unsigned rrset (glue) - then treat 
	as a referal & attempt to validate down its delegation chain...???

--bill