About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

  • From: Peter Koch <
    >
  • Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 12:09:48 +0200

On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:12:40AM +0200, MÃ¥ns Nilsson wrote:

> 1035 says: 
> 
> MNAME           The <domain-name> of the name server that was the
>                 original or primary source of data for this zone.
> 
> I think this is supportive of the idea that questions about the zone SHOULD
> be answered, and that AA bit SHOULD be set. 

"primary" source I'd not read as the "source that's mostly asked", but in
the sense the word is used in "primary master". To comply with the above
definition, it's sufficient to supply the zone to at least one secondary
(ususally by AXFR). So even when 1035 was not explicitly designed to
support hidden primaries, it is flexible enough to allow for them.
The update to 1035 in RFC 1996 makes this even clearer.

-Peter




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community