Re: [dns-wg] RIPE's MNAME recommendation

[Francis Dupont <]

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   So, my suggestion is to adjust the MNAME text in a way that keeps the
   original spirit but explicitly says that the name in MNAME 
   
   1) must resolve to an A RR(Set) 

=> A and/or AAAA

   2) the address (or, to complicate matters, addresses) must be the public
      address of the (hidden/stealth) primary master
   
=> I support Peter's proposal.

Thanks

Francis.Dupont@localhost