Re: [dns-wg] DNSSEC Policy Development Process

[Marcos Sanz/Denic <]

Olaf,
Jim,
all,

> Colleagues, you may recall Olaf posted a proposal to the list a few
> weeks ago. It was about changes to the in-addr.arpa delegation
> process to accommodate DNSSEC. In other words, updates to the
> templates  and database to allow for keying material, additional
> checks at the NCC, etc, etc.

To my eyes the proposal is good and I am happy somebody is taking the 
plunge. Congratulations.
Two comments:

http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/key-maintenance-procedure.html
To a layman, the meaning of DLV can't be tracked down. A reference 
missing?

http://www.ripe.net/rs/reverse/dnssec/registry-procedure.html
I suggest making the ds-rdata attribute an [inverse key]

Best regards,
Marcos