Re: [dns-wg] ripe policy about reverse dns?

["Olaf M. Kolkman" <]

Peter Gervai grin@localhost wrote:
> I tend to remember that RIPE had a strict policy about delegated address
> space reverse DNS: adresses must have a valid reverse and delegated (sub)
> blocks must be registered in RIPE db. I wanted to refer to the document
> mentioning these requirements but I was not able to find them. 


Hello Peter,


The reverse delegation policy is documented in:
           http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/rev-del.html

There is _no_ wording about the RIPE NCC requiring reverse delegation to
be set up by the LIR or by the end users. 


I reckon that the language you tend to remember is from the RIPE 244
(obsoleted) section 5.0: "LIRs should provide reverse delegation
corresponding to an assignment during the complete validity period of
the assignment."

I hope this answers your query.

Kind regards,

-- Olaf Kolkman
   RIPE NCC.

PS. "Encouraging the use of DNS IN-ADDR Mapping" by D. Senie
might be relevant. That draft is currently discussed in the IETF DNSOP
working group, the most recent revision can be found at:
http://www.senie.com/dan/draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required.txt 





---------------------------------| Olaf M. Kolkman
---------------------------------| RIPE NCC