Re: [dns-wg] AAAA lookup misbehaviour

[Jim Reid <]

>>>>> "David" == David Malone dwmalone@localhost writes:

    David> The only feedback that I've got so far is from Peter, and
    David> I've made the changes that he suggested. The last paragraph
    David> mentions trying to automatically nag someone regarding
    David> problem servers - I'm not sure if we should be advocating
    David> this or if we should be saying it is a bad idea.

Well if we don't get a consensus on this here, let's put the subject
on the agenda for the next WG. We can always ask the meeting for a
decision.

Personally speaking, I'd support some sort of reminder though not a
public naming and shaming. However this opens up a couple of other
issues.  What happens when there's no response to the email nagging
(or whatever)?  This is often how lame delegation reports get treated.
It might also be sensible to include your AAAA recommendations in
RIPE's delegation checks, especially for the new reverse delegation
procedure that's being introduced. Perhaps the WG could make a
decision about that too.