Re: do we need a meeting of the DNS TF ?

> Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@localhost writes
>  * I can't see important problems which could make
>  * a meeting of the DNS TF necessary but perhaps
>  * I've forgotten something ?
>  * 
>  * Thanks
>  * Francis.Dupont@localhost
> 
> Question is whether we want to overhaul the domain object, or just
> approve the small changes discussed last week. If we just want the
> small changes, I am sure we can do it in the db-wg (Wilfried?). If we
> want other bigger changes, we'd probably need a dns-wg meeting.

We probably should still do it - if possible - within the db-wg. 
It's (just :-) another object and I think we should decide what's 
it use and what's the future of each of its attributes. I think 
it more relates to documented procedures and common usage of the
RIPE DB than to DNS. It also has relevance with two action items
in the db-wg (documentation, another new domain-object for in-addr
delegations).
But maybe I'm lacking the history of the dns-wg and db-wg 
than please excuse my ignorance.

> -Marten

Andreas   (Knocke, DE-NIC)