Re: [db-wg] restoring person object

[Marco Hogewoning marcoh@localhost]

On 22 sep 2009, at 12:57, Nigel Titley wrote:

> Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> > Isn't this why they invented roles ? and if you are no longer part of
> > that role I see no reason to keep the person object.
> Have you no romance in your soul? I'm attached to my person object and
> my NIC handle (and yes, I understand the desire to spring clean the
> database and remove stuff that is really dead and gone).
Trick question...yes I'm emotionally attached to my person object and  
therefore I make sure it doesn't get unreferenced, in the meantime I'm  
also doing some usefull stuff from time to time so there is no need to  
remove me (yet).
What I meant to say was that it seems usefull to have a person object  
if for whatever reason you are in fact involved with running the LIR  
or the technical stuff behind it. If you stop doing that, what is the  
need to have your object asociated with the LIR.
But there is a shortcut here, write a poem about your emotional state  
and reference your person object from there :)
Groet,

MarcoH