Re: [db-wg] irt object useless

On May 27, Gert Doering gert@localhost wrote:

> So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only
> one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: -
> otherweise irt: is pretty useless.
I agree with this, but this is not how I read the original proposal.
If this is the new proposed behaviour for default database queries then
I fully support it.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature