Re: [db-wg] irt object useless

[Andre Koopal <]

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:05:34PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > > As I don't see any more comments on this, have we already reached consensus?
> > Hiding more-specific objects by default is such a major change that I
> > do not think it can be deployed after a discussion among just three or
> > four people.
> 
> Nobody wants to hide more-specifics.
> 
> The goal is to show the inetnum: object (as before) and, in addition to that,
> the most-specific available irt: object.  *In the default response*.
> 
> So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only
> one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: -
> otherweise irt: is pretty useless.
> 
That is exactly what I mean.

And I don't see this as a discussion between 3 or 4 people, everybody can
read this and participate. So the rest either doesn't care or agrees :-)

Regards,

Andre Koopal