Re: [db-wg] irt object useless

[Gert Doering <]

Hi,

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 07:51:31PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > As I don't see any more comments on this, have we already reached consensus?
> Hiding more-specific objects by default is such a major change that I
> do not think it can be deployed after a discussion among just three or
> four people.

Nobody wants to hide more-specifics.

The goal is to show the inetnum: object (as before) and, in addition to that,
the most-specific available irt: object.  *In the default response*.

So if the inetnum: has its own mnt-irt: then show it, but if there is only
one for the encompassing /16 (or whatever), then show the "parent" irt: -
otherweise irt: is pretty useless.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  71007  (66629)

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster@localhost
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234