Re: [db-wg] Implementation of POEM object

[Arife Vural <]

> > poetic-form: FORM-LIMERICK
> > descr: Poem type for Limerick
> > admin-c: AMR68-RIPE
> > mnt-by: RIPE-DBM-MNT
> > changed: ripe-dbm@localhost 20050429
> > source: RIPE
> 
> Slight problem with this example. I beleive we agreed that the description
> of the poetic form should be in the form of the poetic form itself. I gave a
> number of examples: limerick, haiku, prose, and english sonnet in my
> original presentation. This example does not comply with the requirement.

You mean like that, right?

descr: FORM-LIMERICK

I got the requirements from DB-WG mailling list thread. From there it was not 
so clear. If there would not be any objections, I could replace those entries 
as you proposed.

Arife