Re: [db-wg] Changes for abuse

[Randy Bush <]

>>> no TLD's that accept e-mail.
>> please do not add restrictions which are not in the protocol.
> agreed in the spirit of RFC 3696, if nothing else.

actually, i was thinking of 2821

>> and there are current email recipients of the form user@localhost.
> As an exercise that's fine, but in this particular case it is calling
> for trouble. There are some role addresses that should have lower access
> thresholds

don't tell others how to manage their email, thank you very much

randy