Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: [db-wg] RIPE51 DB-WG Draft Agenda V1]]
-
To:
-
From: Havard Eidnes <>
-
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:06:53 +0200 (CEST)
> > We have changed the behaviour of the database so that when
> > you do a "-c" lookup, we return the IRT object in the
> > reply. I thought this was the desired behaviour. You can see
> > it here:
>
> This is useful, but the desired behavious was to always return
> the relevant irt record for inetnum queries, along with the
> most specific inetnum object.
I guess the missing phrase both in the action point and in the
above reply is "by default".
(And, yes, I agree, that is needed for this action point to make
any sense.)
Regards,
- Håvard
|