|
|
 |
Re: [db-wg] Signature expiration check proposal
-
To: Database WG <>
-
From: Joao Damas <>
-
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:31:44 +0200
excellent idea, I would even propose the allowed time to be shorter,
like one day or two (at most)
Joao
On 21 Jul, 2005, at 14:49, Katie Petrusha wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
This is a proposal about changes to how the whois database software
checks
PGP and X.509 signatures on incoming updates.
Currently the software checks that the PGP signature is valid by
using Gnu
Privacy Guard (GnuPG). It verifies X.509 signatures with an OpenSSL
(Secure
Sockets Layer) tool.
We propose to change the software, so that it also checks the
signature
creation date. If the signature is older than one week, it will be
rejected
and the update will fail.
This is to prevent replay attacks on database objects. We became
aware of this potential threat when we designed the DNSSEC
provisioning
system.
--
Katie Petrusha
RIPE NCC
|
|
 |
 |