Re: [db-wg] Proposed changes for abuse

["Niall O'Reilly" <]

On 16 Feb 2005, at 17:39, Ulrich Kiermayr wrote:

> In my opinion this aproach is wrong. an inetnum or route does not have 
> an email or even read emails. There is *someone* there handling abuse, 
> who has an email (maybe designated for abuse) that is reading malis 
> and hopefully doing something. What do I miss here.
On 6 May 2004, at 11:39, Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> Making the _same_ distinguished attribute available in both primary
> (inet*num, AS) and secondary (reference-targets: person, role, org, 
> irt) objects
> gives the widest scope for maintainers to do what is _convenient for 
> them_ whilst
> retaining overall consistency.
Best regards,

Niall O'Reilly
University College Dublin Computing Services

PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9