Re: [db-wg] abuse-c

["Marco d'Itri" <]

On Jan 12, MarcoH marcoh@localhost wrote:

 >If you define a abuse-c: as a person/role object, you still have the
 >problem that people need to resolve it and then possibly get multiple
 >addresses. So the problem doesn't get solved and we can just stick with
 >the irt-object.
Not if the relevant IRT object is automatically returned for every
inetnum query. This is what ARIN does, BTW.

 >I think for this we can better stick to the most simple solution
 >available.
I think you should define better you requirements of simplicity...

-- 
ciao, |
Marco | [4046 bascZNOGgkZo2]