Re: [db-wg] abuse-c
- Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:27:52 -0500 (EST)
> Well, except that the word 'abuse' may be a bit easier to understand
> than 'irt' for many non-RIPE-database-gurus, I do not see much
> difference between a reference to an IRT object or a reference to a
> person/role object. The big difference is that an IRT is usually
> better protected (see below) and provides more information.
I don't see IRTs and abuse-c as inconsistent. In particular, I'd like
to see _one_ of them ASAP, whichever one it is.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
|