Re: [db-wg] Draft: "status:" re-evaluation

[David Kessens <]

Shane,

On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 03:08:57PM +0200, Shane Kerr wrote:
> 
> We have received input from APNIC on the subject.  They proposed a
> simpler layout, and we think their suggestion makes sense.  However,
> we would like to go forward with a slightly modified version that
> incorporates the "organisation" object we are working on.

If you like their proposal, is there any reason why we cannot go ahead
with their prososal instead of making yet another incompatible
change between RIPE NCC and APNIC ?!?

David K.
---