Re: [db-wg] New "status" tag of REVOKED requested

[Aleksi Suhonen <]

Hello,

Quote from Hank Nussbacher:
} >I think 90-120 days is too little before removing the inetnum object.  I
} >also think that a better a tactic would be to add a "remarks" to the
} >inetnum or perhaps create a new "status" tag such as REVOKED.  I also think
} >such a policy should be uniform between RIRs.

} >Comments?

Status: REVOKED sounds like the most sensible thing to do. I don't
believe in lengthening the period before reallocation, but some sort of
a more proactive revocation procedure might get the address space back
into production faster and the new status value could be part of that.

--
	Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy
	Internetworking Consulting