Re: [db-wg] changed-lines in objects.

[Mark Prior <]

At 12:44 PM +0200 24/5/03, Shane Kerr wrote:
> It does not address the problem that people assume that the "changed:"
> attribute actually properly identifies when an object was changed.  If
> this is desired, then the attribute should be made mandatory, and the
> timestamp always added by the server.  In the past, there has been
> opposition to this idea.
Your suggestion does have merit. If people want to tag the changed 
line they can do and for those of us who don't we just see when it 
was (possibly) last changed.

Why did people oppose the idea of it being added by the server?

Mark.