Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

[Robert Kiessling <]

Nigel Titley nigel@localhost writes:

> > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
> 
> Don't you mean assignments? :-)

No.

> > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
> 
> Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)

5.3 of the 2002-04-25 draft: "LIR-to-ISP allocation". LIRs are free to
suballocate the allocation they got from a RIR. Such a suballocation
is neither an assignment nor a RIR-allocation, so should get a
separate status attribute (as found in the original proposal).

Robert