Re: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

[Pekka Savola <]

On 12 Jun 2002, Nigel Titley wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 13:00, Robert Kiessling wrote:
> > Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg@localhost writes:
> > 
> > > This is an excellent idea. However I would use 
> > > ALLOCATED_TO_LIR and ASSIGNED_TO_END_USER.
> > > That way we clarify the subtle difference while
> > > maintaining consistency with existing documentation.
> > 
> > This is still missing a status for allocations done by LIRs to someone
> 
> Don't you mean assignments? :-)
> 
> > who is neither LIR nor end user ("NLA").
> 
> Examples? (I'm probably just being stupid)

Small ISP which has neither resources or the need to be a LIR.

(One that might need, say, /40 with HD80%)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords