About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

RE: [apnic-talk] Status field for inet6num objects

  • To: Guy Davies < >
    "'Nigel Titley'" < >
    Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • From: Geoff Huston < >
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 22:02:52 +1000
  • Cc: Anne Lord < >
    Joao Luis Silva Damas < >


I tend to agree with Nigel, although I'd go for something even
plainer like DELEGATED-TO-LIR and ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER (I know
they're a bit verbose but they're absolutely clear ;-)  It also makes
clear that addresses assigned to an LIR in the role of END-USER are
exactly that.  That way, an individual who is struggling with English
as a second language (or even their first language ;-) can be
absolutely clear of the status of a range of addresses.

For me these two phrases, DELEGATED-TO-LIR and
ASSIGNED-TO-END-USER, hit the spot precisely!

excellent suggestion Guy!

Is it appropriate to request consideration of these terms as replacements
for ASSIGNED and ALLOCATED?


Geoff






  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community