Re: Can anyone shed some light on this?
-
To: Stephen Burley stephenb@localhost
-
From: Berislav Todorovic beri@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 11:38:32 +0100 (CET)
-
Cc: lir-wg@localhost, db-wg@localhost
I guess that you have to ask RIPE NCC hostmasters to put the newly invented
(RPSL) "mnt-routes:" attribute to your inetnum object:
inetnum: 212.249.0.0 - 212.249.255.255
netname: CH-UUNET-981023
The RPSL security mechanisms are pretty complex. In order to create a route
object the inetnum's "mnt-routes:" and aut-num's "mnt-by:" must point to
the maintainer object(s) authorizing you to make changes.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Stephen Burley wrote:
>> route: 212.249.0.0/16
>> descr: UUNET CH
>> origin: AS702
>> mnt-by: AS702-MNT
>> password: *********
>> changed: jsc@localhost 20011204
>> source: RIPE
>>
>> I send the above object to the DB and get the following error:
>>
>> New FAILED: [route] 212.249.0.0/16
>> route: 212.249.0.0/16
>> descr: UUNET CH
>> origin: AS702
>> mnt-by: AS702-MNT
>> changed: stephenb@localhost 20011204
>> source: RIPE
>> ***Error: Hierarchical authorisation failed, request forwarded to
>> maintainer.
>>
>> Objects in RIPE-181 format are no longer accepted.
>> Please see http://www.ripe.net/rpsl for more information.
>>
>> RIPE Database Maintenance Department
>>
>> Which is strange as the mainainer is us AS702-mnt. Any help on this matter
>> whould be appreciated as this is not the only one.
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen Burley
>> UUNET EMEA Hostmaster
>> SB855-RIPE
>>
>>
>>
>>
--------- Berislav Todorovic, Senior NOC Specialist --------
------- KPNQwest N.V. - IP NOC (formerly EUnet NOC) ------
---- Wilhelmina van Pruisenweg 78, 2595 AN Den Haag, NL ----
--- Phone: +31-70-379-3990; Mobile: +31-651-333-641 ---
-- Email: beri@localhost <=> beri@localhost --
--- _ _ ____ _ .--. ____ ____ __/_ ---
----- /__/ /___/ /\ / / / | / /___/ /___ / ------
------ _/ \_ / _/ \/ (__.\ |/\/ /___ ____/ (__. -----
|