Re: Antwort: Re: Deletion of .de domain objects

["Sascha E. Pollok" <]

Dear Sabine,

>We mirror the RIPE objects and there will be current no difference between 
>RIPE and DENIC stored information. There is indeed a difference between 
>RIPE and DENIC published information. And that is because of German data 
>protection laws. We migrate to a sheme where personal data has to be 
>stored whithin DENIC and after a while of migration we will stopp to 
>acceppt RIPE Handles and at that point unreferrenced objects whithin RIPE 
>can be deleted and updates have to be made in both databases.

Since it will be only possible for DENIC-members to change Person/Role-objects
in the DENIC-DB, as I assume, the workload of DENIC-members would raise
enormously when maintaining objects for their resellers (like we are)
is added to their responsibilities. Am I right here?

>> And why do I have the feeling I got not really informed by DENIC
>> prior this happening about the changes?
>
>There was more than one year discussion about this issue. It was discussed 
>at many meetings. Before these migration we gave three time notice to our 
>members. I feel really that we have done a lot to keep people informed.

Ok. Then it is the DENIC-member's resposibility or fault that "we" didn't get
informed about these major-changes. Without being subscribed in this
mailing-list,
we wouldn't have been notified in any way, I think. 

I fully understand your tendencies to having the personal-data more secure
but I, and I assume many of other "resellers" too, would appreciate a
maintainer-system
like currently present in the RIPE-DB, that gives all ISPs the possibility
of maintaining
person-/rolehandles for them and their customers in the DENIC-DB.

>Sabine

Regards,
Sascha

--- 
Sascha E. Pollok 
Internet Port Hamburg 
Technical Staff / Network Operations
Grosse Reichenstrasse 27
D-20457 Hamburg 
Germany 
Tel.   +49 (0)40 37 49 19-0 
Fax    +49 (0)40 37 49 19-29 
Email: sp@localhost
ICQ #38955239