Re: Deletion of .de domain objects

[Daniel Roesen <]

On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:32:53AM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote:
> It will greatly help with the consistency of Person objects.
> Several of our customers have several RIPE Handles - Just because
> each is mnt-by a different provider.

AFAIK this will not change es DENIC-handles will be tied to
DENIC-members, too. Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

> OBVIOUSLY since the Person handles have not yet been migrated, the person
> data in denic's database is not authoritive.

But it gets delivered to querying clients. Without any information
about the data being non-authoritative and people should query RIPE.

> So WHY did you NOT set your own maintainer before Denic did so?

Thats another question. What DENIC did I would call "hijacking". Not
everyone knows the DENIC-P password.

> You do realize that a person without a maintainer can be changed by
> ANYBODY?

You do realize that he's not able to change his data anymore but DENIC?

> This is a serious security risk and could lead to the loss of
> domains, etc.

DENIC is not responsible for the security of RIPE person/role objects.
This is plain insolent.

Do you think CRYPT-PW are secure? C'mon...

Do you think DENICs methods to "protect" things are secure?

NOW we can use PGP-AUTH to protect our data.


Best regards,
Daniel

-- 
Entire Systems Network Operations Center            noc@localhost
Entire Systems GmbH - Ferbachstrasse 12 - 56203 Hoehr-Grenzhausen, Germany
InterNIC-Handle: ES1238-ORG  RIPE-Handle: ESN10-RIPE Tel: +49 2624 9550-55
GnuPG/PGP Key-ID: 0xBF3C40C9 http://www.entire-systems.com/noc/noc-key.asc
GnuPG/PGP Fingerprint:  1F3F B675 1A38 D87C EB3C  6090 C6B9 DF48 BF3C 40C9

Attachment: pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature