RE: object definitions

[Nigel Titley <]

We would be quite happy for the maintainer field to be mandatory in the domain,
inetnum and person objects, and also, I would venture in the route, and
as-macro object (since they are used by many to automatically build filter
lists)

Nigel

On 07-Sep-99 Chris Ottrey wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Work here at the NCC on the Re-Implementation Project (RIP), is well under
> way.
> 
> We have been looking closely at the existing definitions of objects
> incorporating them into our new design.
> 
> We thought that now might be a good time for getting ideas on any
> changes in the object definitions that the wg would like to see.
> 
> Eg. 
>   - "mandatory" mnt_by field in domain
>   - "mandatory" mnt_by field in inetnum
>   - "mandatroy" mnt_by field in person
> 
> (instead of the current - "optional".)
> 
> (Eg. to provide some sort of indication of how much protection
>  users have against someone else deleting all their domains.  Some
>  users may not even realize that it is possible.)
> 
> Existing object definitions can be found at:
> http://www.ripe.net/db/reimp/design/er/er_whois.html
> 
> 
> Chris.
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>  A    ,-._|\  Chris Ottrey
>   \_ /  Oz  \ At work in Amsterdam,
>      \_,--._/ ottrey@localhost +31 20 535 4444
> -=-=-=-=-=-v-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

---
Tel: +44 171 864 4450 Fax: +44 171 864 4488
Well I'm disenchanted too. We're all disenchanted (James Thurber)