Re: Modifications to the inet6num in the RIPE Database

[Bruce Campbell <]

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Engin Gunduz wrote:

> Personally, I would like to see  2030:0:5::/48  instead of
> 2030:0:5:0:0:0:0:0/48 as the result of the query in the
> whois database, since shorthand notation is, IMHO, more
> "readable" by human eye. However, maybe we can introduce
> yet another option to the whois server and client to show
> the query result on inet6num objects without shorthand
> notation?

I'm not sure that adding yet-another-option is a good idea for general
queries, although it would be for setting up various 'interesting'
end-user parsing routines.

Can I suggest instead that the database returns a '% Comment' line before
the object, which most end-user parsing routines should be ignoring
(except for '% No objects found'), in the form: 

 '% IPv6 found: short is xx:xx::/xx, long is xx:xx:0:0:0:0:0/xx'

which would make a) casual queries of IPv6 objects easy to read and b) 
educate said casual queriers about short and long versions of IPv6
numerics. 

Anything which the database 'officially' returns should be in its expanded
form (same as IPv4 objects).

> Well, restricting the usage of shorthand notation could
> ease the implementation of the whois server. But, IMHO,
> in the user side, it is better to allow it.

Make shorthand notation on the input side a warning condition when the
notification/object is returned to the user (eg: WARNING, expanded
xx:xx::/xx to xx:xx:0:0:0:0/xx etc), so that the database works in fully
qualified IPv6 numbers (FQIPv6N?), but understands both.

Regards,

-- 
  Bruce Campbell <bruce.campbell@localhost      +61-7-3367-0490
                 Systems Administrator (#2)         Just dis guy
    Asia Pacific Network Information Centre