Re: "changed" field should be deleted

[Dale Amon as Operator <]

On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Joe Abley wrote:

> Actually, thinking about it, why is the changed field "id" an e-mail
> address at all? Given that most (all?) records are protected to some
> degree by maintainer fields, surely anything good enough to identify the
> changer to his fellow maintainers would do?
> 

It can also be useful to the site itself since it documents which
of n people actually did the last update.