bug in the whois/wais query?
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 96 15:45:14 +0200
Hello,
I have noticed a problem with a person called Matyas Matyas.
I needed him in the RIPE database. I queried the database and got:
whois -h whois.ripe.net "Matyas Matyas"
person: Dedi Matyas
address: RADCOM Ltd.
address: 8 Hanechoshet St. Tel-Aviv 69710, Israel
phone: +972 3 6472694
fax-no: +972 3 6474681
e-mail: dedi@localhost
nic-hdl: DM55-RIPE
notify: lir@localhost
mnt-by: NNCC
changed: steiff@localhost 960225
source: RIPE
I therefore registered the following person:
person: Matyas Matyas
address: HotSoft Tirgu Mures - ROMANIA
address: O.P. 1, C.P. 172
address: 4300 Tirgu Mures - Romania
phone: +40 65 16 65 16
fax-no: +40 65 16 62 90
e-mail: matyi@localhost
nic-hdl: MM200-RIPE
notify: ncc@localhost
changed: zsako@localhost 960403
source: RIPE
I queried the database in the same way and I got the same result as the first
time!
Therefore I suspected the person had been registered earlier and I queried
the database with the WAIS option (through telnet info.ripe.net).
I looked for the word "Matyas" and I got three results, one of them was the
object below:
person: Matyas Matyas
address: HotSoft Tirgu Mures - ROMANIA
address: O.P. 1, C.P. 172
address: 4300 Tirgu Mures - Romania
phone: +40-65-166516
fax-no: +40-65-166290
e-mail: matyi@localhost
nic-hdl: MM184-RIPE
changed: alina@localhost 960326
source: RIPE
and two irrelevant person objects, but the person with the NIC-handle
MM200-RIPE was not there!
I got a similar result with a different keyword ("matyi" from the e-mail
address) and again got MM184-RIPE, but not MM200-RIPE.
Is this normal (did I miss something) or is this a bug?
(I see two different problems which might have the same cause:
- why does the whois not give me both MM184-RIPE and MM200-RIPE as an answer to
the 'whois -h whois.ripe.net "Matyas Matyas"'?
- why does the WAIS not give me the person object MM200-RIPE?
).
I could explain however the behaviour of the WAIS query by the fact that it
does not search the "real" database, but a copy of it, which is updated in
bigger chunks. Is this the explanation for the second problem?
I find no explanation for the first problem though...
In case I missed something please excuse me for polluting your mailbox and
taking your time...
Best regards,
Janos
PS. I will delete the person MM200-RIPE next week, but I want to leave it there
for the moment in case somebody wishes to investigate the problem.
|