1st report on db indexing problems
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 1995 18:13:00 +0200
This was sent to me; in order to be able to see patterns
I think it is useful to post this to the list. many thanks
to Arnold for the report; we do our best.
Again: will people who have problems with too large database
index files please step forward? Please give us a chance to
break our database too (the test-version, that is)
Geert Jan
------- Forwarded Message
From: Arnold Nipper nipper@localhost
We are using perl.c,v $$Revision: 4.0.1.8. Currently I try to index with
perl, version 5.000. We are using:
adderror.pl (1.1)
addkey.pl (0.16)
cldb.pl (1.10)
cleandb.pl (0.44)
cleanhandledb.pl (1.1)
dbadd.pl (0.23)
dbclose.pl (0.14)
dblock.pl (0.13)
dbmatch.pl (1.2)
dbopen.pl (0.15)
dbupdate.pl (0.34)
defaults.pl (0.13)
defines.pl (0.18)
donetdbm.pl (1.5)
encmp.pl (0.13)
endiffs.pl (0.12)
enkeys.pl (0.18)
enparse.pl (1.8)
enread.pl (0.17)
entype.pl (0.13)
enukey.pl (0.13)
enwrite.pl (0.23)
handle.pl (0.13)
maintainer.pl (1.6)
misc.pl (0.45)
net2net.pl (0.14)
netdbm.pl (0.15)
newdb.pl (0.13)
notify.pl (1.8)
rconf.pl (0.34)
rfc822.pl (0.18)
showdbm.pl (0.12)
sortdb.pl (0.17)
syntax.pl (0.55)
syslog.pl (0.14)
template.pl (1.4)
Warning: time.pl is not a RCS file
updatecheck.pl (1.20)
whoisd.pl (0.52)
Machine is a Sparc10 clone running SunOS Release 4.1.4 with more or less
standard kernel (only modified udp_checksum and MTU)
Regards, Arnold
P.S.: I know that DE-NIC has the same problem with indexing the DB.
|