About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Latest and hopefully last iteration of ripe-81++

  • To: Laurent Joncheray < >
  • From: Marten Terpstra < >
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jul 1994 16:45:06 +0200
  • Cc:

Laurent Joncheray lpj@localhost writes
 * 	Ok, here are my last comments again (seens that last time they
 * went directly to /dev/null). I won't accept a document which does not
 * allow more than 1 update of an object per day.

 * in case of several changes in the same day. Proposed syntax
 * (compatible with the older one):
 * 
 * 	changed: <email> YYMMDD [hh:mm:ss] [+oo]
 * 
 * If hh:mm:ss is missing we assume 00:00:00 +00 ???
 * +oo if the offset from GMT. (i know, we have to deal with the times
 * zones :-)

This is not for us to decide. The database working group should decide
on this. However, your statement that the document only allows one
update per day is wrong. The current database can take as many updates
per day for one object as you like. Implementation matter.

-Marten



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community