About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: The addition of guarded fields

  • To: (Gilles Farrache)
  • From: (Antonio_Blasco Bonito)
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jul 93 15:01:07 MET DST
  • Cc:
  • Organization: GARR Network Information Service

---- Gilles Farrache writes:
> 
> Marten,
> 
> I think that the RIPE NCC have to split blocks. RIPE NCC is a
> neutral organisation that can do it without problems. If we
> do not agree on that, that means a very long procedure to update
> the guarded fields, and I believe that no service provider
> will want to rely on the efficiency of a NIC for its routing
> policy. So that mean that nobody will use those fields for
> routing, so the information may be completly out of date.

I think we, as part of the european networking community, should pursue
the spreading of technical knowledge among network providers and
network operators. IP routing is not a trivial issue for the time being,
and the best results in routing coordination is obtained, in my opinion,
when the largest possible number of network operators do the right thing.
This is the spirit of the Internet, I think.
The NCC is a neutral organizations but this does not mean they should
act on behalf of network operators. The net result could be a minor
diffusion of relevant technical knowledge.
Service providers and even large network users communities should know
what they are doing when registering networks, creating guarded fields.

Also, local registries (down the tree from the NCC) must improve their
efficiency. The Internet is growing very very fast in Europe and we
have to use solutions that scale. A do-all NCC is not the solution, I guess.
I think the NCC is going is the opposite direction (i.e. proposing
the PRIDE project, which I feel a very important activity in the next future)

> But I agree with Blasco on one point, the maintainer of the block
> must be inform that the block has been splitted

Thank you, Gilles.

----------                                                     ----------
Antonio_Blasco Bonito                          E-Mail: bonito@localhost
GARR - Network Information Service      c=it;a=garr;p=garr;o=nis;s=bonito
c/o CNUCE - Istituto del CNR                         Tel: +39 (50) 593246
Via S. Maria, 36                                    Telex: 500371 CNUCE I
56126 PISA   Italy                                   Fax: +39 (50) 904052
----------                                                     ----------



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community