Re: 193.in-addr.arpa procedures V1.3
-
To: bonito@localhost (Antonio_Blasco Bonito)
-
From: Marten Terpstra <Marten.Terpstra@localhost
-
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 93 14:30:58 +0100
-
Cc: local-ir@localhost, db-wg@localhost, dns-wg@localhost
bonito@localhost (Antonio_Blasco Bonito) writes:
* >
* >
* > Folks,
* >
* > One last go. I think we folded in most of the comments from Blaso and othe
* rs.
* > We have included the procedures for single class C reverse zones, not via
* > block zones.
* >
* > We are already doing our first trials with block delegations, all seems to
* > work fine. Please let's get this document accepted and delegate these bloc
* ks.
*
* Sorry for this late comment, but it has come now to my mind:
* I think it would be wise to include recommended values for SOA fields
* (refresh, retry, etc). This could save problems to ns.ripe.net
* when acting as secondary.
What do you think recommended values are ? I know have for everything in
193.in-addr.arpa:
@ IN SOA ns.ripe.net. hostmaster.ripe.net.
(
1.20 ; Serial
14400 ; Refresh 4 hours
3600 ; Retry 1 hours
604800 ; Expire 7 days
518400 ; TTL 6 days
)
which in my view is reasonable, since these things (just delegations) do not
change too often. For the actual class C zones, we have for
45.87.192.in-addr.arpa (RIPE NCC net):
@ IN SOA ns.ripe.net. hostmaster.ripe.net.
(
1.4 ; Serial
28800 ; Refresh 8 hours
7200 ; Retry 2 hours
604800 ; Expire 7 days
86400 ; Minimum 1 day
)
Are these fine to be recommended ?
-Marten
|