Re: 193.in-addr.arpa procedures V1.3

> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> One last go. I think we folded in most of the comments from Blaso and others.
> We have included the procedures for single class C reverse zones, not via
> block zones.
> 
> We are already doing our first trials with block delegations, all seems to
> work fine. Please let's get this document accepted and delegate these blocks.

Sorry for this late comment, but it has come now to my mind:
I think it would be wise to include recommended values for SOA fields
(refresh, retry, etc). This could save problems to ns.ripe.net
when acting as secondary.

Blasco