About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: Operational Contacts

  • To: Arnold Nipper < >
  • From: Daniel Karrenberg < >
  • Date: Thu, 22 Oct 92 17:45:45 +0100
  • Cc: RIPE Database WG < >

  > Arnold Nipper nipper@localhost writes:
  > 
  > We should soon introduce this new NOC object.  If for example a service
  > provider wants to give support to all his customer networks, all three
  > attributes have to be added to a lot of networks.  And then the phone
  > number changes ...  Don't waste time. 

This sounds like re-opening the discussion. Questions:

	- Do more people feel strongly about this?
	- Might they even feel strongly enough to circulate a proposal
	  for the NOC object?

	- Shall we come back on the interim soloution?

If there is consensus on the list discussion that (contrary to the Paris
consensus) we should proceed immediately and quickly with the NOC object,
I am very reluctant to put an interim soloution into place.

Please comment on this, even if it is just

	Yes, reopen the discussion.
	No, proceed as agreed in Paris.

The NCC needs to know what the DB WG wants quickly.

Daniel

PS: My personal preference is to go ahead quickly with the NOC object but
    I think this was not the consensus in Paris.



  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community