About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: status: EARLY-REGISTRATION

  • To: Florian Weimer < >
  • From: Shane Kerr < >
  • Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 15:01:56 +0200

Florian Weimer wrote:
Where can I find up-to-date documentation of the semantics of this
value?

The proposals in the ERX document don't match the actual practice
(IMHO), so I wonder if there are different guidelines.
The most up-to-date is probably the "status:" draft document:

http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/status-attributes.html#database

Although the document has not been (and will not be) moved to "real" RIPE document, the following currently applies:

"inetnum objects with a “status:” value of “EARLY-REGISTRATION” may only be created by RIPE Database administrators. More-specific inetnum objects added may only have a “status:” value of “ASSIGNED”."



As to what it means... these are objects that are imported during the ERX. They do not count against the 80% utilisation requirements for LIRs, and the RIPE NCC may not have ever had a relationship with the holders of the addresses. As such, in many ways they fall outside the ALLOCATED/ASSIGNED scheme that the rest of networks are in.

--
Shane Kerr
RIPE NCC




  • Post To The List:
<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community