|
|
 |
Re: [ca-tf] Draft pre-read document for the CA-TF workshop of 13February
-
To: Leo Vegoda <>
-
From: Róbert Kisteleki <>
-
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:31:26 +0100
-
Cc: Henk Uijterwaal <>,
-
Organization: RIPE NCC
And this is where the problem lies. If the RIPE NCC provides a CA
outsourcing service then it significantly reduces the need for network
people to be involved in the certificate renewal. But by reducing this
need it risks a deterioration in contact information when registrants'
internal communications are less than exemplary.
During the renewal process, we can also define a step between acknowledgment
of payment and the actual renewal of the certificate, where we ask the LIR
to confirm contact information details. This could be coupled with other
steps, like "check the bill and the contact information attached, and pay if
okay", but it might be better to separate the two. Anyway, the idea is that
_before_ renewal, we ask for confirmation from the LIR, which IMHO does not
slow down the process significantly.
Cheers,
Robert
|
|
 |
 |