|
|
 |
RE: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in investigating report of email abuse (spam)
-
To: "peter h" peter@localhost, anti-spam-wg@localhost
-
From: "brett" brett@localhost
-
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:30:32 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: anti-spam-wg-admin@localhost [ ]
On
> Behalf Of peter h
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 11:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [anti-spam-wg] Non-cooperation of RIPE ISP in
investigating
> report of email abuse (spam)
>
> >
> >
> Even if RIPE pulled these netranges from spammers, how can advertized
BGP-
> rotes
> be enforced ? I was under the impression that routing at BGP-level
> is a more or less "gentlemens aggreement(and subject to arbitrary
> route injections from time to time)
>
> Pulling the ranges without authority to enforce the redrawal ia a
moot.
>
Indeed and this is one of the reasons RIR's are working on certification
of address space so that this could at some stage become part of the
exterior routing protocol.
Brett
|
|
|
|
